4 ms·
What a low effort and low thought reply. No one said it is. I’m saying there’s a principled way to have free speech and still take down spam.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
What a low effort and low thought reply. No one said it is. I’m saying there’s a principled way to have free speech and still take down spam.
- Eisenstein 4y agoI'm sorry, please clarify. What does the 'government aspect' have to do with 'twitter removing other forms of censorship'? What is 'content neutrality' and how is it different from 'viewpoint neutrality'? How does pointing out that 'censoring' in regards to removing objectionable content by a corporation relate to the first amendment at all, and what does being 'principled' have to do with it?
- realgeniushere 4y agoMaybe this is more productive: What point were you trying to make with your spam comment? And how isn’t it addressed by twitter abiding by viewpoint neutrality but not content neutrality?