I think Tailwind is great but I agree with many of the issues raised. I desperately needed a _language_ instead of a framework back when Tailwind was still a f

I think Tailwind is great but I agree with many of the issues raised. I desperately needed a _language_ instead of a framework back when Tailwind was still a framework. As I could not get any response from them, I ended up rolling my own called Turbo CSS - this was like 2 years before their compiled version came out. Take a look if you want to consider alternatives. https://developer.boomla.com/turbo-css https://developer.boomla.com/turbo-css I'd compare the two as Tailwind being primarily a framework, a language second, while Turbo is a language first. For example, in Turbo you write libraries and reference class names in libraries via `my.btn` instead of polluting the global namespace. It also has first class support for classes, like you can do `hover:my.btn`, which Tailwind doesn't support (to my best of knowledge, it definitely didn't back then). Also, Turbo has zero global side-effects, which makes it great if you don't control the entire codebase (think CSS reset).