3 ms·
I imagine a good lawyer would argue both that the leaflets were harmless, and that it was constitutionally protected speech, as a way of covering all angles.
by redthrowaway 15y ago
I imagine a good lawyer would argue both that the leaflets were harmless, and that it was constitutionally protected speech, as a way of covering all angles.
- MaysonL 15y agoAnd I would also hope that his lawyer(s) will get the leaflets entered into evidence, so that the jury can read them.