3 ms·
I don’t see how it’s an infringement of free speech at all. A companies TOS form a contract between the user and the company, this law is just requires that co
by avianlyric 4y ago
I don’t see how it’s an infringement of free speech at all.
A companies TOS form a contract between the user and the company, this law is just requires that companies follow what’s written in a contract they will fully entered into.
To claim that this is an infringement of speech is to claim that there’s no situation where a court can force someone to perform, as required by a contract they entered into. In other words, it’s to say that any court enforcing a civil contract is defacto infringing upon that persons right to free speech. Clearly that’s ridiculous because it would totally undermine the value of any signed contract.
- throwarayy42521 4y agoIf that was the case, the law would have no real effect, as pretty much every TOS already says that any content can be removed at the site's discretion.
- avianlyric 4y agoYou seem to be under the illusion that this is a well written law, that actually achieves its creators objectives. All of the evidence so far points in quite the opposite direction.