It's hard to imagine a more self-entitled group of complainers than the RIAA. I have valuable stuff in my house; it is my job to protect what I own. If I feel

It's hard to imagine a more self-entitled group of complainers than the RIAA. I have valuable stuff in my house; it is my job to protect what I own. If I feel the items are extremely valuable, I should be prepared to personally pay substantial amounts to keep them safe. So I buy insurance, door locks, whatever. And for the betterment of society, we all pay taxes so that firemen can do their jobs and give us general protection of all property. What money has the RIAA paid to keep things safe? Their only contribution so far seems to be raising the blood pressure of everyone else. Lawsuits count as raising blood pressure. The RIAA has the audacity to complain that Google spent "only" 60 million protecting things? Is Google a security company that advertises protection services? Even if it was, shouldn't the RIAA be footing the bill? If you want 200 million dollars worth of protection instead of 60 million, RIAA, then why don't you pay Google 200 million?