3 ms·
> What? Why are we the problem? This may just be me because I from CA and was inspired to work in tech as kid in the 90s and saw the drastic and detrimental cu
by Melting_Harps 4y ago
> What? Why are we the problem?
This may just be me because I from CA and was inspired to work in tech as kid in the 90s and saw the drastic and detrimental culture changes that have come over the years/decades: many of you keep attributing these scamming events to us when in reality you FAANG/SV/VC insider types likely went to school or worked with them and turned a blind eye to this very obvious behavior that bred this culture; if you worked for or with them you likely even enabled this behavior in order to clout/status chase for a 'disrupter's' reference or network connections for funding. I've seen it far too often, and somehow for calling it out we become 'persona non-grata' in our homes because trnsplants who only came to SV for the money and status rather than make remarkable tools and disrupt legacy gate-keepers 'want to get theirs' all while all playing some odd cosplay to the contrary.
The truth is that the tech that underlies cryptocurrency's like Bitcoin have it's roots in SV and has been advocated by Cypherpunks from the late 80s-90s and many of it's most notable people in this space were around in that time (eg Hal Finney worked for Phil Zimmerman during the Crypto wars and took on the US Government and risked prison). And it's a slap in the face to be told how we're not wanted or just scamming people with our focus and pursuits in tech because of this gross over-generalization that is based on an immense blind spot that who you are talking about is within your side more often than amongst out own--I admit we have had scams but the most notable are due to incompetence and ignorance in dealing with new tech (MTGOX) in real-time rather than an outright desire to scam.
Bad players have existed in Bitcoin, I've seen it plenty of times, but as is the case with the biggest ones like FTX and BlockFi it tends to be from your ilk, not ours.
- balsam 4y agoMay want to add Do Kwon (Stanford) and 3AC (Columbia) to further solidify your case.
- Melting_Harps 4y ago> May want to add Do Kwon (Stanford) and 3AC (Columbia) to further solidify your case. But it's more fun when other's help drive the point further for me! I would also include conbase (not a typo) ties to Goldman Sacs and YC, but unless you've seen its horrible descent over the years you wont know why they should be included.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]