3 ms·
But it does mean that SD 2.0 is worse. Much, much worse. User experience is a big part of image generation. Yet, Midjourney 4 can output better images with eas
by snird 4y ago
But it does mean that SD 2.0 is worse. Much, much worse.
User experience is a big part of image generation.
Yet, Midjourney 4 can output better images with easier prompts.
- toxicFork 4y agoMidjourney is Mac, SD 2.0 is Linux
- okamiueru 4y agoI get it, and I somewhat resent it. The user perception of OS is mostly third party software availability and driver support. I've used all three, and as far as "operating system" comes, Linux is the only thing that feels good to use. But, I suppose the analogy isn't entirely inaccurate either. MJ is entirely owned by someone else, it can be removed at any time, including anyone's availability. While SD is flexible, allows a stable foundation to be built on, and you can extend it any way you want... I couldn't have built a gRPC based wrapper around MJ, set up a bot that listens to prompts sent through telegram, and post back images. Hm.. or I suppose one could do the same with with MJ API... so, bad example :D
- kread 4y ago[dead]