> the dystopic future where AI art rules every conceivable variation of human creativity thought ...This part admittedly trip me: How is it that a system that

> the dystopic future where AI art rules every conceivable variation of human creativity thought ...This part admittedly trip me: How is it that a system that mirrors every variation of human creativity dystopic? Human creativity is softly bounded by the environments we interact with & the techniques created/(taught to us) for creating such works, along with the knowledge & philosophies that were also created/(taught to us). Ultimately, human creativity is limited in terms of contextual data. The entire art genre of retrofuturism showcases this intentional lack of data in practice. Scenario: A HASDMLASKD drive doesn't mean anything at first, until a general guiding focus is given to the concept of this drive. Only when it's been given some context do our imaginations fill in the gaps (e.g. space, or storage, or for submarines). If there's a system that encompasses/surpasses the area that human creativity exists in, that doesn't mean the "oh woe to humanity" doomerism that comes in quick reaction to such a system. It just means that there's a system that can be systematically learnt from & help augment current creation capabilities that lead to more works in the future: Such doomerism is only warranted within a nihilistic context of "humanity will never surpass X", when a more appropriate "X will help increase the area that humanity lives within" could be slotted in.