3 ms·
So the solution is to build a system with all the same flaws, but loses every benefit offered by traditional public transit systems? The US is obviously bad at
by eiiot 4y ago
So the solution is to build a system with all the same flaws, but loses every benefit offered by traditional public transit systems?
The US is obviously bad at public transit, but the solution isn't to build tunnels for cars.
- midoridensha 4y agoYou say that like it's obvious, but to Americans who can't imagine life without cars, it just isn't.
- WeylandYutani 4y agoI think that is not entirely true. I'm sure everyone in Chicago, Boston or New York understands how many cars it would take to replace public transit.
- tomjakubowski 4y agoAnd how much space they'd need to clear in their cities to make room for those cars.
- runarberg 4y agoEven in San Francisco. The amount of people the Bay Bridge serves in congested rush hour traffic (14,000 people one direction) is just half the people the Transbay tube serves inside BART trains (27,000 one direction). Without the Transbay tube you’d need 2 more bay bridges to accommodate the additional traffic, and there is no way you could fit all those cars on the San Francisco streets, not even if they rebuilt the waterfront highway. https://youtu.be/HbZXtSnabWc?t=226 https://youtu.be/HbZXtSnabWc?t=226
- midoridensha 4y agoThose people are a very small minority of Americans, and I never said "all Americans", but rather "Americans who can't imagine life without cars", which is probably most of them.