Misattributing a source is not the same as engaging in a discussion. It isn't a substantive reply or even tangentially related to the topic. Furthermore, I hav

Misattributing a source is not the same as engaging in a discussion. It isn't a substantive reply or even tangentially related to the topic. Furthermore, I have a bridge to sell you if you believe that central bank apologists do not have an "agenda". Evaluating the argument on the merits solves all of this.