> Land that is converted in to something else is the main deforestation Apparently you can log an old growth forest, and "replant it" and it doesn't count as d

> Land that is converted in to something else is the main deforestation Apparently you can log an old growth forest, and "replant it" and it doesn't count as deforestation. That's the core of the issue here. The question is: should old growth be logged or preserved? The question isn't: should old growth be logged and replaced with brand new trees, which will, apparently, "preserve" the forest land.