2 ms·
The way this is written makes me suspect that the post itself would hash to an illegal number, but I don't have the capacity to check it out.
by InitialLastName 4y ago
The way this is written makes me suspect that the post itself would hash to an illegal number, but I don't have the capacity to check it out.
- GuB-42 4y agoNone of the major cryptographic hashes (MD5, SHA-*) have practical preimage attacks. It means pulling off what the author suggests (having a document hash to an illegal number) is impossible in practice, at least for now. It could be possible using a non-cryptographic hash (murmurhash, CRC,...).