3 ms·
Why not both? This is a false equivalence, they can be and are all bad.
by Mistletoe 4y ago
Why not both? This is a false equivalence, they can be and are all bad.
- pessimizer 4y ago> This is a false equivalence > they can be and are all bad. This sentence is arguing against itself, because you felt like you had to stick two twitter cliches in. Por que no los dos? Porque cuando dos cosas no son identicas, no son identicas tampoco.