3 ms·
Obviously there isn't "no COVID". Nobody is suggesting that. If there was "no COVID" they wouldn't need the lockdowns. They're trying to minimize covid by being
by solumunus 4y ago
Obviously there isn't "no COVID". Nobody is suggesting that. If there was "no COVID" they wouldn't need the lockdowns. They're trying to minimize covid by being extremely reactive to it because they don't have effective vaccines yet. The situation still makes OP's comment correct. If they stop being highly reactive and open up before they have better vaccines then the results will be extremely bad.
- zarzavat 4y agoI don’t see any bears. The bear patrol must be working like a charm. What evidence is there that the lockdowns in China are effective at doing anything at all? What evidence is there that COVID hasn’t already passed through the population like it has in every other country? What evidence is there that the “people who will die if the lockdowns are stopped” didn’t perish long ago? The main evidence appears to be the existence of the zero-COVID program itself. Surely a country wouldn’t pursue such a damaging policy unless it was effective, right? What we do know: post-omicron variants of the virus are extremely transmissible and defeated all other attempts at zero COVID.