>I don't really like how this is said as if it is 100% true I don't see it as being said that way. What was said was, "we should also consider in a positive s

>I don't really like how this is said as if it is 100% true I don't see it as being said that way. What was said was, "we should also consider in a positive sense". That is more nuanced than automatic trust, it's more like giving the benefit of the doubt until shown otherwise. If you are automatically and reflexively suspicious of all public broadcasters and major daily newspapers, then who are you not suspicious of?