I think it's more interesting that this poorly-worded "riddle" managed to find its way onto wikipedia: A section titled "The Language Paradox" was removed on O

I think it's more interesting that this poorly-worded "riddle" managed to find its way onto wikipedia: A section titled "The Language Paradox" was removed on October 2: > Careful wording must be used to ensure that the "paradox" is correct. With the explanation: "This is 100% original research, which as noted contains errors" So the only thing that makes the "paradox" interesting is that it's badly worded, but any commentary to that effect is original research, so in the end we're just left with a fairly unremarkable riddle on Wikipedia and grumpy people like myself complaining about it.