3 ms·
In the example you've provided, it looks like the town has benefited from the money launderer buying the property, didn't it? The bad actor was the previous own
by credit_guy 4y ago
In the example you've provided, it looks like the town has benefited from the money launderer buying the property, didn't it? The bad actor was the previous owner, who "wiggled through the system" (i.e. both the town and the guy were corrupt). The new owner may have been a bad guy in other parts of the world, but didn't have the connections in this town, and didn't know what strings to pull. The town condemned the house, which ended up being taken over buy some good guys, so happy end.
Did I get the story right?
- joshspankit 4y agoIn that case it wasn’t a money launderer, but you’re probably right that the old owner and the town were corrupt. As for the end being happy: We’ll see. There is a lot of work and a lot of cost ahead.