4 ms·

I like it, but it relies on too much luck once all logical deduction is exhausted: I feel like it needs another clue source in there. Perhaps giving you a flop

I like it, but it relies on too much luck once all logical deduction is exhausted: I feel like it needs another clue source in there. Perhaps giving you a flop card for free would be enough. Another thing is to accept any answer that would explain the bronze/silver/gold. Or what would be cool is take WSOP actual games, show the action and the cards, and you guess the flop/turn/river.

sgjohnson 4y ago
> Another thing is to accept any answer that would explain the bronze/silver/gold. Then all you would ever need is one guess.
aqme28 4y ago
Yes agreed. Had everything dialed in except a card that I only knew to be a spade and no helpful information from the ranks. Just had to exhaust my guesses numerically.
- darepublic 4y ago
  I didn't realize it on first playthrough but since the rank is ordered on the flop you do have a clue that way
- thathndude 4y ago
  Got to this point as well. But it requires a certain amount of logic and intelligence to put together the process of elimination test efficiently. Got mine on try 6.
- origamiPyro 4y ago
  Wait, my pokle question was: Liz: Qd Qc, 2nd, 1st, 1st Riz: 4s 9s, 1st, 2nd, 3rd Siz: 10d Ad, 3rd, 3rd, 2nd I got it in 5, and my answer had no spade in it. Did we have different pokles?
  - david_allison 4y ago
    I had the same question as you
  - aqme28 4y ago
    I lied
- yccs27 4y ago
  The rules drastically limit the needed guessing with the "No random kickers" rule: The rank of each board card will alway be a part of at least one player's hand in at least one phase.
  - thathndude 4y ago
    Have played this for a week now. Took me 3-4 days to understand the no-kicker rule. Once you do, the game becomes a lot easier. I almost wish there were kickers. Maybe modify it to no kickers in the turn or river.
  - j7ake 4y ago
    I had to guess because one of the three flop cards were uniformative
darepublic 4y ago
Any answer that explains the rankings is too broad. That takes no luck and you should get it first time. I get what you mean though, there is a bit too much luck
evancox100 4y ago
You get an additional clue that there are no “kickers” on the board. Quoting from the the help: “No random kickers on the board - The rank of each board card will alway be a part of at least one player's hand in at least one phase. Note: "part of a hand" means the significant card(s) in: Pair, Two Pair, Three of a Kind or Four of a Kind (not kickers) TLDR: You may have to guess a card's suit with no clues, but not it's rank”

sgjohnson 4y ago

> Another thing is to accept any answer that would explain the bronze/silver/gold. Then all you would ever need is one guess.

aqme28 4y ago

Yes agreed. Had everything dialed in except a card that I only knew to be a spade and no helpful information from the ranks. Just had to exhaust my guesses numerically.

darepublic 4y ago
I didn't realize it on first playthrough but since the rank is ordered on the flop you do have a clue that way
thathndude 4y ago
Got to this point as well. But it requires a certain amount of logic and intelligence to put together the process of elimination test efficiently. Got mine on try 6.
origamiPyro 4y ago
Wait, my pokle question was: Liz: Qd Qc, 2nd, 1st, 1st Riz: 4s 9s, 1st, 2nd, 3rd Siz: 10d Ad, 3rd, 3rd, 2nd I got it in 5, and my answer had no spade in it. Did we have different pokles?
- david_allison 4y ago
  I had the same question as you
- aqme28 4y ago
  I lied
yccs27 4y ago
The rules drastically limit the needed guessing with the "No random kickers" rule: The rank of each board card will alway be a part of at least one player's hand in at least one phase.
- thathndude 4y ago
  Have played this for a week now. Took me 3-4 days to understand the no-kicker rule. Once you do, the game becomes a lot easier. I almost wish there were kickers. Maybe modify it to no kickers in the turn or river.
- j7ake 4y ago
  I had to guess because one of the three flop cards were uniformative

darepublic 4y ago

Any answer that explains the rankings is too broad. That takes no luck and you should get it first time. I get what you mean though, there is a bit too much luck

evancox100 4y ago

You get an additional clue that there are no “kickers” on the board. Quoting from the the help: “No random kickers on the board - The rank of each board card will alway be a part of at least one player's hand in at least one phase. Note: "part of a hand" means the significant card(s) in: Pair, Two Pair, Three of a Kind or Four of a Kind (not kickers) TLDR: You may have to guess a card's suit with no clues, but not it's rank”