4 ms·
It's probably a combination of techniques to be honest. They do have some unprecedented access to contextually heavy data, as well as an unusually large base o
by swalsh 15y ago
It's probably a combination of techniques to be honest. They do have some unprecedented access to contextually heavy data, as well as an unusually large base of free labor to supervise the learning...
My creepy moment came when It correctly pointed out the exact location of this photo:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40127665@N03/4788700749/in/set-72157624483067340/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/40127665@N03/4788700749/in/set-...
I was in the middle of Costa Rica. For fear of roaming charges my phone was not on, and I never made a status update. The photo was taken on a D40 at the time, so no location exif data, and frankly the the picture is kind of generic.
My best guess is it used the other photos in the album to gain contextual information. For example this photo was in the same album:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40127665@N03/4789329722/in/set-72157624483067340/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/40127665@N03/4789329722/in/set-...
this, to me, would be extremely easy to recognize.
- __alexs 15y agoSimply not making a status update isn't enough. You'd have to never visit a page with a Facebook like button from a computer which you'd used ever to log in to Facebook with. I'm yet to be convinced that this feature requires actually analysing image content at all. GeoIP and time stamps alone can provide a huge amount of context before you even start on things like mobile clients providing location data.
- DJN 15y agoBoth photos are in a public folder on Flickr called "Costa Rica".
- swalsh 15y agothe facebook album was named "D40 Pics", but it would be curious if it is cross referencing photos with flikr.
- waterlesscloud 15y agoOr that species of insect only lives in Costa Rica. Kidding! If it was that good, I really would be shocked.