3 ms·
Wasn't there just another story from the last day or so about how there are too many pedestrians killed by traffic? Doesn't that make this a big step in the wro
by josephcsible 4y ago
Wasn't there just another story from the last day or so about how there are too many pedestrians killed by traffic? Doesn't that make this a big step in the wrong direction?
- blamazon 4y agoBefore jaywalking, cars were demonized as rampant killers in USA. There were efforts to ban them in cities entirely. Certain interests didn't want that, so 'jaywalking' was invented - suddenly cars were not the invader in the pedestrian's street, it was the other way around--peds were now interlopers unless explicitly instructed by car infrastructure. This led to cars going faster in urban environments, with more infrastructure for cars while pedestrians got smaller and smaller slices of the street to use. This series of events is a huge cause of the current state of high pedestrian deaths by traffic. Legalizing pedestrianism is one move in a larger strategy to unroll the mistakes of the past and reclaim the most valuable parts of our cities for humans once again.
- stephen_g 4y agoNo, because "jaywalking" laws never really made people safer... There are obviously many problems to solve, but having crossing the street in many areas criminalised doesn't really help with any of them.
- caconym_ 4y agoWhat percentage of pedestrians killed by motor vehicles in any recent time window of your choice were jaywalking when it happened?