Calling out the inherent absurdities in the constant attacks on the character of anyone following the evidence or remaining agnostic isn't a personal attack. Ma

Calling out the inherent absurdities in the constant attacks on the character of anyone following the evidence or remaining agnostic isn't a personal attack. Maybe the fact that you feel attacked when seeing a pale reflection of what you are spouting should tell you something. If you believe there need to be extra moving parts in your theory without evidence, that's fine. Calling someone who doesn't religious is where you start to sound like every crank in history that couldn't wrap their head around heliocentricism or relativity.