3 ms·
I generally concur with sibling commenters' criticisms, but I still enjoyed reading this article. To me it's a light-hearted but nevertheless thorough explorati
by cardamomo 4y ago
I generally concur with sibling commenters' criticisms, but I still enjoyed reading this article. To me it's a light-hearted but nevertheless thorough exploration of coffee brewing. I love that the author attempts to answer a question that almost nobody was asking—simply out of sheer curiosity!
- deepspace 4y ago> I still enjoyed reading this article I am sorry, but I have to disagree. The stilted, repetitive, one sentence per paragraph style is so obtrusive and so reminiscent of blog spam that I could not focus on the content. At the end of the day, all the author does is re-brew a cup of coffee with used grounds. Who has not tried that at least once (and went blegh and never tried it again)? To me, the article is as content-free as it is hard to read.
- NoahTheDuke 4y ago> I am sorry, but I have to disagree. You disagree that they enjoyed the article?