When someone is this confident, and they get anything about their prediction substantively wrong, you should question anything else they say with confidence in

When someone is this confident, and they get anything about their prediction substantively wrong, you should question anything else they say with confidence in the future. So, on the off chance this gentleman's prediction is wrong, we should question his fundamental methodology and distrust by default any predictions he makes after this. It should be easy to test, because he provided a year, and outlined how the process would unfold. We could check back in late 2027, though I reckon we'd have a pretty good idea long before then.