4 ms·
> were willing to put 5-10% of their income in exchange for work from home. Why? The company is going to use your home as an office and they should be paying t
by varispeed 4y ago
> were willing to put 5-10% of their income in exchange for work from home.
Why? The company is going to use your home as an office and they should be paying that 5-10% extra.
Why business paying corporate landlord for office space is okay, but when Joe Public offers his own lowly place then it's a no no?
When people don't recognise their value, they are prime for being exploited.
- bluesign 4y agoThere is no inherit value, it is determined by market, mostly supply and demand.
- zach_garwood 4y agoMaybe you folks don't have to pay property taxes, but in the US we do, and that's a pretty clear indication of an "inherent value".
- bluesign 4y agoSorry if it was not clear, I meant value of work.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- agsamek 4y agoWe did the experiment to check if people are serious about WFH. There is a lot of work to make it happen inside a company. In particular to treat remote people as first class citizens. WFH was also a choice after covid and not necessity. With a pay cut we are sure people are serious about WFH and not only demanding.