> even hg has a more consistent interface. did they just care more? perhaps it was the benefit of learning from the mistakes of git? If they learned from the m

> even hg has a more consistent interface. did they just care more? perhaps it was the benefit of learning from the mistakes of git? If they learned from the mistakes of git, they must have learned fast. According to Wikipedia, the first release of mercurial was on April 19, 2005 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercurial https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercurial), just 12 days after the first release of git on April 7, 2005 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git) Or did they do what git should have done: early on bite the bullet for a complete overhaul of the CLI, making the various options consistent?