Everyone here is taking a single example from the article and assuming it applies to all people who use these services. I think the comparison, albeit a bit ext

Everyone here is taking a single example from the article and assuming it applies to all people who use these services. I think the comparison, albeit a bit extreme, is fair given that everyone presupposes there's no good reason to use these services and everyone knew what they were getting themselves into off of one anecdote. Mostly because it's at least drawing people to consider there is another side to this.