2 ms·
Maybe because IBM connected the 8087's INT output to the 8086's NMI, so the 8087 became a source of NMIs (and with really trivial stuff like underflow/overflow,
by anyfoo 4y ago
Maybe because IBM connected the 8087's INT output to the 8086's NMI, so the 8087 became a source of NMIs (and with really trivial stuff like underflow/overflow, forced rounding etc., to boot).
Even if you could disable the NMI with external circuitry, that workaround quickly becomes untenable, especially when it's not fully synchronous.
- _tom_ 4y agoThat sounds right. It's been a while.