3 ms·
I've recently used Hurl [1] in some projects. It seems to have a similar goal and I like i a lot though it misses "imports" which makes modeling of more complex
by nikeee 4y ago
I've recently used Hurl [1] in some projects. It seems to have a similar goal and I like i a lot though it misses "imports" which makes modeling of more complex workflows hard.
[1]: https://hurl.dev https://hurl.dev
- ushakov 4y agoHow does the "imports" feature supposed to work and how does it help modelling more complex workflows? Also, would you be able to take a look at Step CI and tell me what you think about it, especially in comparison to Hurl? https://github.com/stepci/stepci https://github.com/stepci/stepci It could be that Step CI already has the feature you're looking for!
- nikeee 4y ago> How does the "imports" feature supposed to work and how does it help modelling more complex workflows? If hurl had something like an import feature, one could re-use HTTP requests. For example, one could create a file that logs into the service and use it in all other tests. It doesn't support that, so the only option you have is to re-write the login in every test _or_ build a script that outputs that. There is an open issue for that: https://github.com/Orange-OpenSource/hurl/issues/115 https://github.com/Orange-OpenSource/hurl/issues/115
- ushakov 4y agoGotcha! https://docs.stepci.com/guides/organising-tests.html https://docs.stepci.com/guides/organising-tests.html We will also support reusable sessions/credentials soon