> That said, experience tells me to always get both sides of a story. Can anyone suggest a good representation of the other sides' position? I've never unders

> That said, experience tells me to always get both sides of a story. Can anyone suggest a good representation of the other sides' position? I've never understood why this is seen as a good idea. In the spirit of your statement, can you suggest a good representation of why you think this is worthwhile? There's no natural law that issues should have two sides, and I think forcing everything into that framing is part of why our media discourse is so broken. This also promotes the misconception the truth lies in the middle, which encourages people acting in bad faith to pick extreme positions and skew the average.