4 ms·
Well he is right in that Huawei source code has been reviwed by Uk gov, and they found nothing. The accusations do appear to be based on nothing at this time.
by ClumsyPilot 4y ago
Well he is right in that Huawei source code has been reviwed by Uk gov, and they found nothing. The accusations do appear to be based on nothing at this time.
I would like tonsee rigorous benchmarks for vode quality and trustworthyness, not arbitrary and whinsical political decision-making
- cscurmudgeon 4y agoJust because UK found nothing doesn't mean others also found nothing. > "We have evidence that Huawei has the capability secretly to access sensitive and personal information in systems it maintains and sells around the world," Robert O'Brien, national security adviser, reportedly said. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/us-finds-huawei-has-backdoor-access-to-mobile-networks-globally-report-says/ https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/us-finds-huawei-has-backdoo... https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-officials-say-huawei-can-covertly-access-telecom-networks-11581452256 https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-officials-say-huawei-can-co...
- ClumsyPilot 4y agoUK government has takes GCHQ to review source code and make spesific conclusions. The links you provide have unspecified official sharing his views of intelligence of unspesified quality. There appears to be no code review and no spesific information about what information Huawei has access to, which equipment is affected, etc. I am not sure we can treat this level of intelligence with complete trust, it could be a PR excersise