2 ms·
Yes, because at a basic level, government officials don't want money from contracts to go fund things that undermine the government itself, or the safety of its
by bb88 4y ago
Yes, because at a basic level, government officials don't want money from contracts to go fund things that undermine the government itself, or the safety of its citizens.
In this case white supremacists have a long history of using violence.
- rootusrootus 4y agoThen we go down the path of deciding what hate speech legally is, what the line is before the gov't will refuse to do business with someone, etc. Not to mention the policy shifting every time POTUS switches party. What a mess. What about Chick-Fil-A or Hobby Lobby? Hate speech? Depends on who you ask.
- bb88 4y agoNo. We'd define what groups are tied to domestic or foreign terrorism. For whatever reason, white power groups can't keep their hands clean of violence -- likely because violence is actually tied to their rhetoric.