this seems equally important. A company should not be disadvantaged when competing for government contracts because of an unrelated stance. This extends directl

this seems equally important. A company should not be disadvantaged when competing for government contracts because of an unrelated stance. This extends directly to individuals. What if an employee at the company is an outspoken critic on one of the topics that can get you thrown out of a contract competition? It's an attempt to silence organizations by disadvantaging them economically. And we all know that if it wasn't Israel related it'd never fly. Imagine for even one second a company was excluded from a contract because of its stance on gun rights, abortion or gay rights. You'd have either half of the country on your mattress within five seconds.