> Under one interpretation of federal law, the public wouldn’t have to corner-cross at all to get to landlocked land: If the only way to reach public land is th

> Under one interpretation of federal law, the public wouldn’t have to corner-cross at all to get to landlocked land: If the only way to reach public land is through private land, people can just take the most direct route “right through the middle.” This sounds entirely reasonable to me. It’s silly that you can own something (the public owning public land) but can legally prevented from accessing it. Also, as a hunter and somebody that enjoys being outdoors, I didn’t know about OnX! Super cool.