6 ms·
As an US citizen “tech person”, I absolutely cheer this on.
by ABeeSea 4y ago
As an US citizen “tech person”, I absolutely cheer this on.
- dmix 4y agoNot using it government/critical telecom makes sense but other but a general rule seems like a big overreach.
- throwaway4good 4y agoThe US campaign against Huawei and ZTE caused the 5G rollout in the west, including here in Europe, to be considerably delayed and much more expensive.
- chitowneats 4y agoHow expensive do you think it would be allowing an entity infamous for intellectual property theft, to have unfettered access to the teleco networks of the countries that they themselves say are their greatest enemies? Yes, imported Russian nat gas is way cheaper. Until it isn't.
- throwaway4good 4y agoFirst I don't really think your premise is correct and second we are capable of keeping our networks secure even if a cable or a base station is made by a Chinese company.
- ABeeSea 4y agoWhy do you think the premise is incorrect?
- throwaway4good 4y agoI worked in tele for a couple of years; the reason Huawei and ZTE got ahead in 5G was that they invested heavily at time when Nokia and Ericsson were focused on cutting cost.
- ABeeSea 4y agoThat was only half the premise, the other half was > unfettered access to the teleco networks of the countries that they themselves say are their greatest enemies? Regardless of how they got their tech, that premise is the reason for blocking them.
- throwaway4good 4y agoAs for the "unfettered access" stuff; a telco, or at least the one I worked at, doesn't really work like that. We buy products and engineering services from our suppliers but we run our own network, and if we did outsource operations, those engineers would sit on premise and the whole thing would be under our control.
- klipklop 4y agoThis is not true at all. If anything they had to tighten their belts to compete with the price dumping Huawei and ZTE were engaging in.
- kube-system 4y ago> we are capable of keeping our networks secure even if a cable or a base station is made by a Chinese company. Not if war breaks out. If that happens, maintenance and support channels will be weaponized and/or sanctioned.
- dilyevsky 4y agoI participated in technical due diligence for a purchase order of huawei tech back in 2011 (was lte back then). Their tech was good but there is no way in hell there isn’t some kind of trick how cheap they were compared to the europeans (there were no americans at that point since motorola was kaput). Like it was basically free. There needs to be some kind of regulation when techniques like that are being played whether it’s security or just economic concerns
- MichaelZuo 4y agoIsn't it obvious why it's so much cheaper? Their pricing for market share and cutting costs wherever they can in terms of labour conditions. I don't see how spending many billions on R&D to develop the most intricately hidden backdoors in human history (that no one has been able to offer proof for) and eating that cost to deploy them when it will all become worthless the moment the first one is detected, makes any sense at all.
- dilyevsky 4y agoI’ve been to their headquarters in Shenzhen it certainly didn’t look like much was being saved on r&d… I’d say much likely explanation is either aggressive government subsidy to price out competition with maybe some mix of wielding political blackmail later on (a la what US is doing with its chip restrictions rn)
- MichaelZuo 4y agoI don't see what they could possibly gain, all it would take is for one genuine case of a backdoor to be confirmed and then all that investment would be nearly worthless.
- dilyevsky 4y agoPeople used to say same exact thing about russian gas
- wankerrific 4y agoThese companies are famous for price dumping as well. This ban is a good thing
- ABeeSea 4y agoStopping consumer IP cameras being used as a mass surveillance operation on US citizens by a hostile foreign government does not seem like an overreach.