3 ms·
> perfectly true and still invalid LOL. In other words, it's only "valid" if it supports your POV? Because you just admitted that "true" isn't part of the crit
by AlbertCory 4y ago
> perfectly true and still invalid
LOL. In other words, it's only "valid" if it supports your POV? Because you just admitted that "true" isn't part of the criteria.
- Brian_K_White 4y agoAre you 5 years old that you don't yet know how "true and yet still invalid" works that you think it's so funny?
- AlbertCory 4y agoNo, please tell us all how "true and yet still invalid" works. Because it's funny that you think that's actually a serious thing to say. Is this something from Foucault or what?
- Brian_K_White 4y agoSo, yes then.
- AlbertCory 4y agoa personal insult; flagged
- AlbertCory 4y agoSo sad, you're not going to tell us all how "true and yet still invalid" works? Makes sense: it'll probably be embarrassing for you. As for being 5: maybe if you were that age and didn't know who Foucault was, you should revert to that.