11 ms·
One of the big tragedies of this moment politically is that so many progressives who love Butler novels like "Parable of the Sower"—or who would love them if th
by holmesworcester 4y ago
One of the big tragedies of this moment politically is that so many progressives who love Butler novels like "Parable of the Sower"—or who would love them if they had read them—think that the urgent drive to establish human civilization among the stars is just a vanity project for rich white men or, worse, a billionaires' conspiracy to escape the earth.
Butler saw the push to the stars as something that could give humans a common purpose and save us from the terminal infighting that happens when we lack one.
It's too bad she isn't alive now to set people straight.
- sverona 4y ago> Butler saw the push to the stars as something that could give humans a common purpose and save us from the terminal infighting that happens when we lack one. This will only happen after we do something about capitalism, if we ever do.
- saiya-jin 4y agoYou mean inventing something better, ie some AI mix? Because anything else mankind tried so far was a disaster and suffering of much bigger proportions.
- elliekelly 4y agoSome portion of that suffering was thanks to capitalist ideologues who actively worked to undermine the success of alternative systems. We don’t really know how well other systems work in the modern world because we haven’t really given any of them a fair shake.
- pieix 4y agoA successful system is robust to tampering from external and internal actors.
- liamN 4y agoby that logic, US democracy and capitalism arent successful either (see Russian election tampering and OPEC influence on US/global economy)
- gordonhart 4y agoAnd yet, the US and capitalism are both still around, and their continued existence ensures we don't get people in comments sections claiming that we don't know how capitalism works as a system because _real_ capitalism still hasn't been tried.
- maxbond 4y agoThis is like the spiderman meme where they're all pointing at each other. One flavor of capitalism fights another, is it any surprise that a capitalist wins or that the overall result is a strengthening of the military-industrial complex due to increased defense spending? How about a more interesting question. Do you believe capitalism is the best or most just way to organize an economy which is possible, that it is "the end of history?" Do you think on an infinite timeline, assuming no extinction of the species or any other confounding factors, humanity will never come up with a better way to organize our economy?
- sverona 4y agoGiven what the US did to the socialist South American states in Operation Condor, this is equivalent to "might makes right," which is no good basis for a political system.
- maxbond 4y agoAndre the Giant wasn't such a tough guy as a newborn, but that doesn't mean I could've wrestled him at his prime.
- PhasmaFelis 4y agoThis is a Just So Story. "The fact that I killed him proves that he was weak and deserved to die." You can do better.
- stevenwoo 4y agoThis kind of does happen in the part of the Parable series of books, at least the two that she finished, one can see the outline of what the heroine starts. It's one of the more hopeful dystopian future apocalypse books I've read, and a lot of bad stuff happens to get to that point. Xenogenesis gets there a totally different way.
- ceejayoz 4y agoI’m pretty sure she’d have strong opinions about folks like Musk owning and controlling the means for that push.
- tomrod 4y agoPerhaps Musk is the necessary evil to point out it is possible to push us to the stars, despite his many flaws.
- maxbond 4y agoI think it's a safer bet that Butler would assert that there is a unity between means and ends (which is to say, that the means you employ define the ends it is possible to reach, eg, an evil approach will only yield evil results) then it would be to bet that Butler was an "ends justify the means" type.
- dnissley 4y agoWhat makes you think she would assert that?
- maxbond 4y agoI'm fairly sure she was an anarchist, but not positive. This is a principle in anarchist thought. If not, she would certainly sympathize with anarchism, based on her views I do know, which is why I qualified it as "more likely" rather than being certain.
- dnissley 4y agoHaving run in anarchist circles when I was younger, it's strange to hear people talk of anarchism as a consistent set of ideas when the reason it holds such a special place in my heart is that there were so many different conceptions of it, many of them incompatible with each other. Which conception are you referring to here? Presumably not anarcho-capitalism.
- tomrod 4y agoStephen Baxter has a similar thread in a lot of his writing. A unifying purpose makes us one tribe. Basing it on a scientific target means we avoid most of the headaches and cruft that other cultural transcription and binding agents suffer. Why not target intelligence surviving the heat death of the universe?
- maxbond 4y agoPersonally I think COVID disproved this hypothesis. The part of the movie where the aliens land and attack us all, regardless of identity, did happen. The unifying did not. I think we have to find a way to peacefully and productively coexist as a multiplicity of tribes.
- tomrod 4y agoCOVID showed that it occurs when we are a politically fragmented society with sprawling wealth inequality. COVID didn't break us. It showed us were our weak points are. We _choose_ what unifies us.
- maxbond 4y agoHmm, that is interesting, but I think about this like, the failure to make the vaccine open source or generally available, the polarization around masks and every COVID measure, and how we are still not rallying around existential problems like climate. But perhaps this is a United States bias on my part?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- maxbond 4y agoI really doubt Butler would be in favor of these particular people pursuing space for these particular goals. Something tells me that a leftist black woman would see Musk, who holds antifeminist views, who seems like he wants to personally rule mars, who's wealth literally originates from apartheid, and who's power comes from deep pockets and not from creating a movement of dedicated survivors who achieve power through collective action, as the wrong person to be involved in space exploration.
- jtr1 4y agoThat’s why I wish she was here: to articulate an alternative view
- morelisp 4y agoYou may enjoy Becky Chambers's To Be Taught, if Fortunate and Ruthanna Emrys's A Half-Built Garden. Neither is very Butlerian in its writing but they's taking aim at the same question of how we may do space colonization without space colonialism.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- dnissley 4y agoPolitics makes strange bedfellows! We live in a strange enough timeline that it wouldn't surprise me if she was in support of "these people". It would certainly be a choice that would provoke and make people think hard about what it is they truly value.
- maxbond 4y agoAre you speculating that based on familiarity with her work or general principles about how things may work? Given what you say about the timeline being strange, and how that seems to be what motivates this speculation, I suspect maybe you haven't had a great deal of exposure to her, and so this conversation about her views on space travel might give you a skewed impression of how important to her space travel was? And therefore, how likely she'd be to make profound compromises for those views?
- phlarbough 4y agoGil-Scott Heron probably said it better, but until people's basic needs are met, I think space exploration has the opposite effect, making people feel disenfranchised rather than united.
- rospaya 4y agoExactly. I'm sure I argued the opposite at some point, but as time goes on Musk, Bezos and others look more like petulant bored rich people, and not explorers or role models of any kind. To most people it's "whitey on the moon".
- revolvingocelot 4y ago>"whitey on the moon" Ladies and gentlemen, Mr Gil Scott-Heron! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goh2x_G0ct4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goh2x_G0ct4
- willis936 4y agoThe motivations are secondary to our capabilities. The truth is we're not ready to set up shop on a more hostile planet. We'd need to be able to spend 10x the resources our current total society can afford to properly seed a Mars colony. Any actual attempts made this century will lead to horrific failure. I can't imagine future generations will have a good taste in their mouth about colonizing Mars when they remember what happened to the first colony. Colonizing Mars an important avenue for the continuing legacy of intelligent life in the universe. It must be taken seriously. Such half-assed attempts that are being discussed by Musk and NASA today only reduce the prospects of humans surviving past Earth. We need to become masters of Earth before we could ever hope to take on a bigger challenge.
- musicale 4y ago> We need to become masters of Earth before we could ever hope to take on a bigger challenge Wasn't the same argument made against going to the moon?
- willis936 4y agoNotice we have no moon colony. Visiting is trivial compared to independently thriving.
- yamtaddle 4y agoWe also need, like, a reason. Even if we can... why? (and "survive the apocalypse" is a pretty bad reason since there are zero other bodies in our star system that are better for humans to live on than even a nuked, climate-changed Earth—anything short of a crust-melting impact would be easier and cheaper to survive with Earthbound bunkers, excepting things that would also wreck other bodies in our star system) Which reasons, as for 99% of everything else like that humans have ever done, will likely be economic or military. When it makes dollar-sense to do it, we'll go. Not sooner. Not really, and not for the long haul. I'm doubting we'll do large-scale human colonization of space for a long, long time, if ever. We might do mostly-robotic asteroid mining within the next 100 years, and a couple visits to e.g. Mars might be made, but nothing serious.
- vkou 4y agoIf progressives not getting behind capitalists and autocrats building their own personal fiefdoms on Mars is the big tragedy of the moment, I'm not entirely sure what a small tragedy would be. A stubbed toe? A temporary shortage of Don Perignon?