Wow what an unfavorable summary of events. Perhaps I can offer a rebuttal since they didn’t bother to ask for one in the article? > Musk has "continued his ra

Wow what an unfavorable summary of events. Perhaps I can offer a rebuttal since they didn’t bother to ask for one in the article? > Musk has "continued his rash of brand unsafe actions — That free speech is murder - that many will die if we have just one social media platform not controlled by liberal journalists and academics - is inherently laughable. That they refuse to quote anyone disagreeing with this inanity shows their real function: not journalism. https://mobile.twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1596527482471354368 https://mobile.twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/159652748247135... > including amplifying conspiracy theories Maybe? > unilaterally reinstating banned accounts such as that of former President Donald Trump Is Taking a vote across millions of twitter users considered unilaterally”? > courting and engaging with far-right accounts Isn’t that the best way to share viewpoints and find common ground? Seems like it would be worse not to engage people with mistaken beliefs. > and instituting a haphazard verification scheme that allowed extremists and scammers to purchase a blue check. Haphazard seems like an opinion. A more charitable view is that things will break when making major fixes. And they’ve already owned up to the mistake, paused the feature and are releasing a version 2 soon.