>I’d say it’s closer to good thing than bad thing due to simplicity. Unless they intended to publish their .gitignore, I'd say it's closer to a bad thing than

>I’d say it’s closer to good thing than bad thing due to simplicity. Unless they intended to publish their .gitignore, I'd say it's closer to a bad thing than to a good thing to have random files from your repository open to the public. The simplest S3 permissions is to allow "*" publically too, but simple doesn't make it better.