> More recent ones give enormous latitude to the company's management. That's the problem with common law - more recent ones set a different 'precedent'. The n

> More recent ones give enormous latitude to the company's management. That's the problem with common law - more recent ones set a different 'precedent'. The next case can set a totally different 'precedent' and you as a ceo can be part of that 'precedent'. Still evaluates to the same.