> ... it’s only legal because there are no laws specifically making it illegal currently. One might argue that any unlicensed use of copyrighted material is mi

> ... it’s only legal because there are no laws specifically making it illegal currently. One might argue that any unlicensed use of copyrighted material is misuse (unless the courts have ruled it is fair use.) Only the copyright holder may bring action against a potential misuse. Typically, individuals tend not to have deep enough pockets to hire the lawyers to bring the action. And during discovery it may be found that the model was trained on works-for-hire made by humans replicating the original style. Or appeals may continue on at more legal cost, without guarantee of recompense. Most will decide it’s just not worth it. Until a company similar Getty buys up all the copyrighted material and, in addition to sensible suits, brings spurious legal action against individuals and turns the tables.