3 ms·
This does appear to be the angle. Which is nice from a "developer building a prototype" perspective, but if you're actually delivering to clients, something lik
by jasonjmcghee 4y ago
This does appear to be the angle. Which is nice from a "developer building a prototype" perspective, but if you're actually delivering to clients, something like Webflow means that the client can make changes themselves and not worry about patching future security vulnerabilities.
- eastbound 4y agoSecurity vulnerabilities are particularly present in executable code; but if it generates a static site, it’s much less prone to vulnerabilities. I’ve seen Webflow or HubSpot site builders, but I’m reluctant to pay $20-to-200, depending on the website.
- jasonjmcghee 4y agoDefinitely- I assumed more than static sites as it specifically mentioned Remix, which is like Next.JS- intended to be used as a back and front end. But I do now see you can create static sites with this too.