> I'm of the position that art needs an artist. As a historical note, this argument is over 50 years old. In 1965, an engineer at Bell Labs generated pseudo-ra

> I'm of the position that art needs an artist. As a historical note, this argument is over 50 years old. In 1965, an engineer at Bell Labs generated pseudo-random artworks inspired by famous artist Piet Mondrian. He found that a) people couldn't tell if the artwork was generated by Mondrian or the computer, and b) people generally liked the computer's art better. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=4437 https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=4437