9 ms·
If I understand this right, the advantage of using this over something like Webflow is that you can have code exported that you can customize much more rapidly
by orliesaurus 4y ago
If I understand this right, the advantage of using this over something like Webflow is that you can have code exported that you can customize much more rapidly and you are not locked in a vendor?
- jasonjmcghee 4y agoThis does appear to be the angle. Which is nice from a "developer building a prototype" perspective, but if you're actually delivering to clients, something like Webflow means that the client can make changes themselves and not worry about patching future security vulnerabilities.
- eastbound 4y agoSecurity vulnerabilities are particularly present in executable code; but if it generates a static site, it’s much less prone to vulnerabilities. I’ve seen Webflow or HubSpot site builders, but I’m reluctant to pay $20-to-200, depending on the website.
- jasonjmcghee 4y agoDefinitely- I assumed more than static sites as it specifically mentioned Remix, which is like Next.JS- intended to be used as a back and front end. But I do now see you can create static sites with this too.