I didn't say it's not an issue, I said it's a separate issue. The question of if a thing is harmful or should be controlled or declared illegal, and the questi

I didn't say it's not an issue, I said it's a separate issue. The question of if a thing is harmful or should be controlled or declared illegal, and the question of how the implimentation mechanics of controlling a thing might be done, are two completely different questions. If you had no way to physically prevent murders, that does not then follow that therefor murder shouldn't be illegal. Failing to realize that is yet another example of jeuvenile. Practically every law, policy, regulation, code, etc has some element of arbitrariness, interpretation, and discretion or selective enforcement. This one is no different.