3 ms·
Is that a standard now? Who's going to tell the guys using .well-known?
by naniwaduni 4y ago
Is that a standard now? Who's going to tell the guys using .well-known?
- sofixa 4y agoIt has always been standard, it was the #1 thing to do when setting up Apache back when Apache was the standard and nginx was still this obscure Russian porn web server. .well-known is much more recent and an exception. Can you think of any other .file or .folder which is wise to be exposed publicly?
- charcircuit 4y agoThat is an apacheism to avoid serving .htaccess which can include hashed passwords. It's not a general thing.
- morelisp 4y ago.plan
- TheHappyOddish 4y agoI was around back then and uploading websites, (version controlling on svn, not git), and I do not recall it being a standard. The closest standard I can think of is .htaccess files (which we did upload) for various vhost specific settings. What is your basis for this standard? Was there a mailing list agreement I missed?
- Karrot_Kream 4y agoMastodon actually uses .well-known for Webfinger stuf.