2 ms·
>Even if you replace every board in the ship, it's still constrained by its original design. Is it though? Or are you assuming it has to be replaced life-for-l
by bumby 4y ago
>Even if you replace every board in the ship, it's still constrained by its original design.
Is it though? Or are you assuming it has to be replaced life-for-like? If so, why don't we apply the same to software? I don't think that constraint is a given with hardware. Is a remodeled house constrained by it's original design? It seems to come down to how much you want to invest in "refactoring" the old house.
Your comment made me think of the evolution of the F/A-18. The new variants are utterly different than their original, yet are still technically the same airframe.
- cratermoon 4y agoone word: 737MAX
- bumby 4y agoCare to elaborate? I’m pretty familiar with the issue, but not sure what through line you’re making
- cratermoon 4y ago> The new variants are utterly different than their original, yet are still technically the same airframe. This is what Boeing had in the 737MAX. It was a different aircraft, but it looked like the 737-800.
- bumby 4y agoThe MAX was under an amended type certification, so they were acknowledging the changes. Boeing didn’t follow their own rules regarding safety design (like redundancy on critical items identified on their hazard analysis)