>It's not avoidable. It's not "breaking the Internet" in any way more than "NAT's are breaking the Internet". I agree. NATs, particularly the Carrier NAT that

>It's not avoidable. It's not "breaking the Internet" in any way more than "NAT's are breaking the Internet". I agree. NATs, particularly the Carrier NAT that smartphone users are behind, has broken the internet. It's made it so most people do not have ports and cannot participate in the internet. So now software developers cannot write software that uses the internet (without depending on third parties). This is bad. So is what you've done. Someday ipv6 will save us.