4 ms·
Author seems very smart, and has probably done some good consciousness work to show up with these ideas... but this is completely ungrounded & disconnected from
by louison11 4y ago
Author seems very smart, and has probably done some good consciousness work to show up with these ideas... but this is completely ungrounded & disconnected from any real use case & understanding of market dynamics... much like the rest of Web3.
- cle 4y agoWhat changes could the author make to keep this grounded and connected?
- olah_1 4y agoExplain it in terms of what people already know, like Wikipedia for example. Help the reader to imagine what kind of world this tech enables.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- the-printer 4y agoThis is essentially what I gathered. I myself am on the borders of becoming a hardcore sneakernet enthusiast.
- cbreynoldson 4y agoI think the post is a bit misleading (e.g. "for everybody" makes it sound like "everybody" can do something about this right now), but I think this comment misses the point of the protocol. This is (I think) supposed to be a shared language between note-taking apps (and eventually others that include "thoughts" I presume). The hopes are that it does "affect everybody," but it is not something that can "affect everybody" without "apps" speaking in this shared language. If you are not somebody who works on these kinds of things, then yea, probably useless to you for now. I think the author wants interoperability at the "thought" level between apps that support users inputting their ideas.
- fudged71 4y agoExplain? Have you missed all of the enthusiasm around "Tools For Thought" and the lack of interoperability between those tools?