4 ms·

Shipping gas without a pipeline is expensive and there is limited capacity to do so on both ends. What is Europe expecting? Massive subsidies from the US on its

by creato 4y ago

Shipping gas without a pipeline is expensive and there is limited capacity to do so on both ends. What is Europe expecting? Massive subsidies from the US on its gas exports?

klamp 4y ago
- boringg 4y ago
  Deep conspiracy right here.
  - WanderPanda 4y ago
  - kodyo 4y ago
    Somebody blew it up. There was a conspiracy behind it.
    - boringg 4y ago
      Attributing it to the US is deep conspiracy.
  - tsimionescu 4y ago
    The US is the most likely culprit, though, isn't it? Clear means and motive, and they even publicly theatened to stop NS2 if Germany doesn't. Russia is the next possibility, but it requires much more complicated conspiracies to explain why they would blow up their own massive infrastructure project. Either way, perhaps some day the results of Sweden's investigation will be made public, and we won't have to guess.
- themitigating 4y ago
  There's no evidence of who destroyed it and just because it would benefit a country doesn't mean that country blew it up. Motivation, especially one as generic as money, is not a substitute replacement for evidence. Sweden is currently investigating it https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/sweden-says-nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-confirmed-as-sabotage/ https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/sweden-says-nord-stream-p...
- AntiRemoteWork 4y ago