2 ms·

No, your assertion is not a logical deduction from the text you quoted. The first paragraph does not list any consequenses for not using Apple accessories. Th

No, your assertion is not a logical deduction from the text you quoted. The first paragraph does not list any consequenses for not using Apple accessories. The second paragraph says that non-Apple accessories *MAY* damage the phone, and that specific damage is not covered under warranty. (Just be aware that in the U.S., the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act requires Apple to *prove* that you caused specific damage before they can deny the warranty coverage for that specific issue.) Edit: If the assertion is logically true from the two paragraphs that were quoted, I would love to hear why, because it simply isn't possible. Downvotes do not automatically mean someone is wrong. Most people are not aware of consumer protections they have, believe companies when they lie, have poor reading comprehension skills, and are emotionally-invested to believe in what they believe is the truth (there has to be a better way to say that last item, any ideas?). Edit 2: added parenthesis around text based on feedback from a reply.

twawaaay 4y ago
> The second paragraph says that non-Apple accessories MAY damage the phone, and that specific damage is not covered under warranty. I would hazard a guess that great majority of people in Brazil do not have either technical or legal knowledge to understand this. Or ability to read specifications and documentation with understanding. They see officially and seriously sounding warning from Apple and they feel the have to go buy a charger and a cable or loose warranty. > Just be aware that in the U.S., the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act requires Apple (...) Except we are talking Brazil, not US.
- MerelyMortal 4y ago
  > we are talking Brazil, not US I'm aware, that's why I stated "in the U.S.". I added parenthesis to help avoid further confusion. > great majority of people in Brazil do not have either technical or legal knowledge to understand this Are you a Brazilian speaking for a culture you are a part of?

twawaaay 4y ago

> The second paragraph says that non-Apple accessories MAY damage the phone, and that specific damage is not covered under warranty. I would hazard a guess that great majority of people in Brazil do not have either technical or legal knowledge to understand this. Or ability to read specifications and documentation with understanding. They see officially and seriously sounding warning from Apple and they feel the have to go buy a charger and a cable or loose warranty. > Just be aware that in the U.S., the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act requires Apple (...) Except we are talking Brazil, not US.

MerelyMortal 4y ago
> we are talking Brazil, not US I'm aware, that's why I stated "in the U.S.". I added parenthesis to help avoid further confusion. > great majority of people in Brazil do not have either technical or legal knowledge to understand this Are you a Brazilian speaking for a culture you are a part of?